Pakistan Bulletin
An up-to-date and informed analysis of key issues of Pakistan.
Disconnected Nation: How Internet Shutdowns Are Choking Pakistan’s Democracy and Progress
December 2024
In an era where digital rights are increasingly viewed as fundamental human rights, Pakistan’s repeated internet shutdowns place it at odds with global democratic norms.
Pakistan’s increasing reliance on internet shutdowns is more than a technical disruption; it is a glaring testament to the growing authoritarian impulses within its political system. These blackouts, justified under the banners of security and public order, serve as powerful instruments of control that cast a shadow over the country’s digital and democratic future. Far from being mere interruptions, they ripple through daily life, paralyzing economic activities and exposing the troubling nexus of governance, power, and suppression in the country.
Pakistan, like all other nations, relies heavily on digital connectivity for its economic and social activities. Freelancers, small business owners, students, and healthcare providers are just some of the groups who depend on stable internet connections. Yet, in times of political unrest or heightened security concerns, the government has repeatedly opted for blanket internet shutdowns, cutting off millions of people from the digital world. This approach is not just a technical measure but a political act that exposes the state’s inability—or unwillingness—to address dissent and disorder through the proper democratic means.
The official justification for these shutdowns often revolves around preventing the spread of misinformation or stopping the organization of protests that could spiral into violence. However, such explanations fail to account for the deeper political motives driving these decisions. Internet shutdowns are, at their core, a tool of control. By disrupting communication channels, the state effectively stifles discord, silences critics, and disorients opposition forces. This tactic aligns with a broader pattern of governance in Pakistan, where the political elite frequently resort to coercive measures rather than engaging with citizens through dialogue and reform.
Pakistan’s existing laws governing internet usage and digital rights are vague and open to abuse. Clearer regulations, coupled with independent oversight mechanisms, can help prevent the misuse of internet shutdowns as a political tool.
The consequences of these shutdowns are dire and intricate. On an economic level, they result in substantial financial losses. The freelancing industry, a growing sector in Pakistan, is particularly hard-hit, with professionals unable to meet deadlines or communicate with international clients. Similarly, small businesses that rely on social media and e-commerce platforms face declines in revenue. Different estimates by national think tanks suggest the loss resulting from internet outages to stand at USD 1million per hour of outage to PKR 1.3billion per day. Such losses are especially significant in a country already grappling with economic instability and rising unemployment.
The social impact is equally severe. Students and educators are unable to access online resources; a critical issue in a country where educational opportunities are already limited. Healthcare providers face difficulties in coordinating care, particularly in remote areas where telemedicine has emerged as a vital service. Furthermore, these shutdowns disproportionately affect marginalized communities, who often rely on digital platforms to amplify their voices and advocate for their rights. By severing their access to these platforms, the state worsens existing inequalities and deepens social divides.
From a political perspective, internet shutdowns are a double-edged sword. While they may offer short-term control, they erode public trust in government institutions over the long term. Citizens increasingly perceive these measures as an attack on their freedom, fostering resentment and alienation. This discontent can fuel further unrest, creating a vicious cycle that undermines the very stability the government seeks to preserve. Moreover, such actions tarnish Pakistan’s international image, raising concerns among foreign investors and human rights organizations. In an era where digital rights are increasingly viewed as fundamental human rights, Pakistan’s repeated internet shutdowns place it at odds with global democratic norms.
The roots of this issue lie in the broader political culture of Pakistan, characterized by a lack of accountability and a tendency to prioritize short-term gains over long-term solutions. Successive governments have failed to establish robust mechanisms for addressing unrest and maintaining public order without resorting to punitive measures. Instead of investing in policies that promote social cohesion and economic development, the political elite often focus on consolidating their power, even at the expense of citizens’ rights.
Addressing this issue requires a fundamental shift in both policy and mindset. First and foremost, the government must recognize that internet shutdowns are not a sustainable solution to political and social challenges. Alternative approaches, such as countering misinformation through public awareness campaigns and engaging with opposition groups through dialogue, should be prioritized. These strategies not only preserve citizens’ rights but also contribute to a more stable and inclusive political environment.
Legal and institutional reforms are also essential. Pakistan’s existing laws governing internet usage and digital rights are vague and open to abuse. Clearer regulations, coupled with independent oversight mechanisms, can help prevent the misuse of internet shutdowns as a political tool. Additionally, civil society organizations and the media have a crucial role to play in holding the government accountable. By raising awareness about the consequences of these shutdowns and advocating for digital rights, they can pressure policymakers to adopt more democratic practices.
From a political perspective, internet shutdowns are a double-edged sword. While they may offer short-term control, they erode public trust in government institutions over the long term. The public discontent can create a vicious cycle that undermines the very stability the government seeks to preserve.
International organizations and foreign governments can also contribute by emphasizing the importance of digital rights in their engagements with Pakistan. Conditional aid and trade agreements that prioritize human rights, including the right to internet access, could incentivize the government to reconsider its approach. However, such measures must be implemented carefully to avoid aggravating the country’s economic challenges.
Ultimately, the issue of internet shutdowns in Pakistan is a symptom of deeper political and governance failures. It reflects a state that is more focused on suppressing conflict than addressing the underlying causes of said conflict. For Pakistan to move forward, it must embrace a governance model that values transparency, inclusivity, and respect for citizens’ rights. This is not just a matter of principle but a practical necessity in a world where digital connectivity is increasingly intertwined with economic and social well-being.
Join Our Mailing List
Get the latest news and updates from our team